• Announcements

    • Songstuff

      New Chat App   06/02/2017

      We have a new chat app available. You will need to sign up for it. You can pick up the invite link at the top of your member hub page:   http://forums.songstuff.com/member/hub/   Remember to use your Songstuff registered email and user name when you sign up! Using the invite link will automatically add you to the Songstuff chat channel.

starise

Site Author
  • Content count

    1,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

starise last won the day on February 9

starise had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

317 Legendary

About starise

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.recordinghound.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    United States of America
  • Interests
    Celtic music, the mysterious, computers and recording.

Music Background

  • Band / Artist Name
    starise
  • Musical / Songwriting / Music Biz Skills
    Yes
  • Musical Influences
    Rock, celtic

Collaboration

  • Songwriting Collaboration
    Maybe

Recent Profile Visitors

3,699 profile views
  1. That is one option . You should get full factory warranty for it as if it were brand new. You may need to register it and jump through a few hoops. I seldom have any problems with b stock. I once did get a new unit through the factory this way.
  2. You only have two more days to pull the trigger on this one. The number is up to four. This looks very tasty indeed. I can almost predict the outcome...almost.
  3. FWIW I know a long time guitar player who gigs regularly using a Zoom he highly recommended it. I think this led me to look at what they offered. For some reason Zoom isn't marketed heavily around these parts and I looked at them like a "lesser" brand compared to others. That was a bad call on my part. I had never considered the fact that it takes batteries. Makes a lot of sense really so long as they are fully charged. My ears liked a lot of the patches in the G3.
  4. If you want to post a pic of your studio I would love to see it. I recommend stripping location data from the pics before posting. I might put a pic up but right now I'm embarrassed by how cluttered it is. And I might actually have to dust in there. I hope dust isn't flammable. If you copy and paste one of those Hollywood million dollar studios we are going to know it wasn't you
  5. I have a pair of M-Audio BX8's . Unfortunately some dust got into the pan pot of my interface volume control and popped. It took out a tweeter on one of them.The tweeter didn't completely blow. It just had a high range honk in it after that. That model is discontinued. I found another tweeter used online and put it in. I can still hear a slight clink in the upper ranges. They are still probably ok for basic work but after that incident I decided to look for new monitors.Old monitors can make a great mini pa system BTW. The BX8's sound pretty good with stereo guitar effects plugged into it. I ended up with a pair of JBL LSR305's. I'm really glad I made that choice since they are an excellent mid level monitor capable of making some wonderful mixes. I also use a smaller recording space. Having the 305 as opposed to the 308 works better in a small studio. I wrote probably more than you ever want to read about it here- http://www.recordinghound.com/jbl-lsr305-studio-monitors-recording-hound-review/ As to the "why". I'm not in the business of charging to record so I can't justify a pair of Adams unless I hit the lottery. I decided to look for monitors in only one price range. TBH I was never thrilled by JBL and it took some convincing to get me to buy them. They have a winner here. Others worthy mentions in a simlar price range are monitors by Yamaha, Alesis, Mackie.
  6. I agree. Hopefully around the holidays we'll get another break.
  7. I have found that it's usually best to wait on a sale to get the best deals on music software. I'll admit Sonar is an expensive proposition to break into initially at 499.00 dollars. After that it gets less painful. Compared to Reaper at 60.00 , Studio One at 399.00 and a few others at that same price point 499. 00 is admittedly on the higher end of this. Sonar isn't alone as there are a few more where the price of admission is steep. I think it is a good value though considering if you like to mix a lot or are mixing for others for hours on end you want something that works well and is full featured. There is a current sale on from Cakewalk that steeply lowers the price of admission by 100.00. Use code GROUP to get it foe 335.16 here: https://www.jrrshop.com/cakewalk-sonar-platinum http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/SONAR/Whats-New#2017.05 For 399.00 you get one of the most professional and powerful daw programs out there. You own this with no strings attached, however updates are additional after a year. Don't forget though, there are occasional sales on the update packages. It's a really great time to bake songs in Cakewalk Sonar!
  8. So I've been a part time user of Studio One for some time now with my last version being 2.5. I had no real reason to change what I was using, but occasionally a new thing will come along that I just cant ignore. Presonus has been making some interesting changes recently to Studio One Professional. The first big one I noticed this past year was the addition of the arranger. The closer you look at this function the better it gets. DAWs have always been able to shift audio around in chunks for arranging purposes. What is different here is the way they have designed the workflow to enable you to move large portions of audio around all at once very easily. Basically you determine which parts of the song you wish to arrange and give them labels. The most common being verse, chorus, break, pre chorus. Once labeled you can move them anywhere with seamless perfection in any order in your song with any number of repetitions. Let's say you want another verse or you don't like where the solo is and you want to move things around. You have 100 tracks you say????!!!!. It couldn't be easier to do in Studio One 3.5. The closest I can come to that in Sonar is I can ripple edit tracks and songs. Not quite as intuitive. I have the matix view which is very similar to Ableton in how it works. So I can do it, but not as easily. The second big thing is latency compensation. They have devised a way to reduce both audio effects and software instrument latency using a new native approach that cuts milliseconds off of latency. As far as I know no other DAW has this. Yes others can set their buffers, but the two are different animals. The new setup has a work around to systems that were held back by a slower internal routing scheme or slower hardware. It is still dependent on your Cpu and interface to some extent, yet it can breathe some life into an older interface. When used with a thunderbolt interface it can scream. I was able to get my old Presonus Firetube studio down to 3ms and 64 buffers. I haven't had the chance to really test it yet, but on paper it looks really good. I just purchased an upgrade from 2.5 to the most recent 3.5 version. Older version won't have this feature. I'll still probably track in Sonar because it's very easy to get good takes using it. Part of that has to do with my eyes liking the graphics and work flow of Sonar. From then on though I'm no longer so sure. SO seems to be leading the pack overall and that's hard for me to say as a partial Cakewalk Fanboy. The tools and layout in Studio One are better for mastering. It's cross platform which doesn't usually concern me as a PC user, however it also means I can share files cross platform. Friends with SO who have a Mac..no problem. If you own a few decent daws you likely really don't need any more plug ins since both Sonar and Studio One are loaded with juicy well done plug ins. I still get the 3rd party ones I think will be helpful. Studio one is tied very well to their Presonus interfaces which takes the quess work out of configuring an interface is using these compatible products. I can'y say the same about Cakewalk with respect to Tascam. Yes almost all interfaces will work in Sonar. It isn't the same as having an interface with control written into the daw. It would only make sense to upgrade my next interface from Presonus. If you get the chance check it out. http://www.presonus.com/press/press-releases/Studio-One-35
  9. Man I had forgotten about this thread. I type way too much.
  10. In my opinion this is up to you.
  11. Every week Melda has a sale offering 4 of their plug ins for 50% off. https://www.meldaproduction.com/ MCompare is one of the plugs on offer. A good A/B tool . Lets you compare a selected commercial mix to your mix. If you ever wanted it now is a good time to buy it.
  12. Wow talk about reviving an old post! Good subject though. My .00002 is this- I haven't found a metronome yet that can add swing. Swing is where the groove is much of the time. Playing swing to a metronome can be difficult because you're playing slightly off the beat. Even midi with a programmed swing can sound mechanical. This is why I opt for a real drum track on material that usually has swing in it like R&B. The drum track can be "pulled in" to a close timing with audio stretch technology. All drummers tend to drift some over time. One of the recent challenges I've had has been taking a vocal with no music and adding a beat to it. In that case I tapped a tempo into my DAW software and then I had a tempo I could map to. I take music lessons on violin and my teacher is always recommending I use a metronome. For classical music it seems to be a necessity. It seems to help, but I can't do it for long and stay sane. I would rather tap my foot.
  13. I'm glad you got it Richard. Yes that's a huge package. I suspect it will take some time to download it all. You won't be sorry. You're gonna love Neutron as well.Can't really go wrong there. I think I really goofed in ordering the wrong package from AIR. They aren't getting back to me. I'm tempted to order the right thing. I'll loose 60 more quid. It's still a deal since individually programs like Velvet and Structure sell for a lot of money. From their end I understand. They are the middle man so they need to contact AIR and try to straighten the whole mess out for a difference of less than 15.00. Not really worth the effort for them. I'll be interested to see how well Structure plays Kontakt samples. The biggest differences are probably the scripting. I'll be pleasantly surprised if it still retains that.
  14. Bass guitar application. A collection of amp sims patterned from famous bass amps. They can't use the real names for legal reasons. The skins should give you a good idea. On sale $ 39.99. https://www.audiodeluxe.com/products/ik-multimedia-ampeg-svx?mc_cid=e0216b41cf&mc_eid=08fe0779bc
  15. Not sure if this makes any sense to you. Sometimes the emotional aspect of the music moves me to such a degree that the words become secondary. More like complimentary. The music takes the lyric to a place that seems to make sense even if it doesn't make sense. I'm kid of analytical , so while I'm attempting to analyze it, I'm also digging it at another level. I also like to hear a good interesting story too. Because of the condensed way we are trained to listen to modern music , the details of the story usually need to come and go in 3-5 minutes. For someone who likes to write long poems this is a real challenge I think. And then there's the long lyrics that still don't get you to a place of resolve.