Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Songstuff

      New Chat App   06/02/2017

      We have a new chat app available. You will need to sign up for it. You can pick up the invite link at the top of your member hub page:   http://forums.songstuff.com/member/hub/   Remember to use your Songstuff registered email and user name when you sign up! Using the invite link will automatically add you to the Songstuff chat channel.

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'infringement'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Main Forums
    • Introduce Yourself
    • Showcase
    • Critique
    • Collaboration
    • Discussion
    • Contests and Challenges
  • Site Information
    • Site Stuff
    • Suggestion Box
    • Complaints and Bugs
    • Help and Support
    • Library

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • AIM Events

Blogs

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Songwriter Interviews
  • Band / Artist Interviews
  • Music Industry Interviews
  • Performer Interviews
  • Producer and Recording Engineer Interviews

Categories

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.


Found 2 results

  1. Until recently, I knew very little about how YouTube deals with copyright violators. Sure…I’d heard stories from friends & colleagues, but I’d never actually dealt with it firsthand. Now I have! For those who aren’t aware, I’m a long-time YouTuber. I set up my first channel back in January of 2010 & currently administrate a total of five. Even with 5 channels, I’d never had occasion to post work I didn’t own, or have permission to use. A few weeks back, I decided to try something new.….a playlist series called “Play Along”. The videos consist of me playing drums to a prerecorded song. Not exactly a revolutionary concept! You’ll find countless examples this type of thing already on YouTube. But….it was new for me & it sounded like fun! My original intent was to post each video without the play-along song. That would have avoided the whole copyright quagmire, but it also had an unintended consequence. It made the finished product much less interesting! After some deliberation, I decided to roll the dice. If nothing else, it could serve as a learning experience. When I formatted my video, I used an mp3 iTunes version of the audio (song). Typically, mp3s of this type contain tagging which allows the track to be detected on platforms like YouTube. I uploaded my project & classified it as an “unlisted” video. This is standard practice for me. Once I view the upload & verify that it’s intact, I change the classification to “public”. It was late, so I put that final review off till the next morning. By the time I logged back on the next day…. The legal owner had already detected my use of his song Reported the violation to YouTube Decided what options to offer me Tagged & set up my video for AD monetization Keep in mind, at this point, my video was still classified as “unlisted”. I hadn’t even checked the upload yet! It seems the wheels of progress turn quickly when there’s revenue at stake! Fortunately for me, this was the outcome I had hoped for. Most of those 2nd hand stories I mentioned earlier had described a similar process. Below is a copy of the actual notice that YouTube/Google attached to my video….. Your video has been blocked in some countries. Copyrighted content was found in your video. Because of the claimant's policy, this video can't be played in some countries. VIEWING RESTRICTIONS · Video blocked in 1 country · Unavailable on some devices MONETIZATION · Monetized by claimant If you agree with these conditions, you don't have to do anything. Learn More Copyright details CONTENT CLAIMANT POLICY · Look Away (Album Version) - The Ozark Mountain Daredevils · Sound recording · 0:02 - 3:29 play match · UMG · Blocked in some countries · Remove Song · File a Dispute Additional details about original version of the notice: When you hover over the “Video blocked in 1 country” statement, it tells you which country…in this case - Germany. When you hover over the “Monetized by claimant” statement, this notice appears – “You can use the copyrighted content in your video, but ads might appear on your video.” As you can see, the poster is given 3 basic choices: 1. Do nothing, indicating that you agree with the arrangements already negotiated. 2. Remove the copyrighted song 3. File a dispute over the ownership of contested material, in this case the play-along audio track. Clicking on the “Learn More” link took me to a page containing this statement – “Am I in trouble? · In most cases, getting a Content ID claim isn’t a bad thing for your YouTube channel. It just means, “Hey, we found some material in your video that’s owned by someone else.” · It’s up to copyright owners to decide whether or not others can reuse their original material. In many cases, copyright owners allow the use of their content in YouTube videos in exchange for putting ads on those videos.” In the spirit of full disclosure, that page also contains information pertaining to other potential outcomes. Occasionally, the owner of rights can strongly object. In some of those cases, your standing as a YouTube member can be affected….both negatively & permanently. So, the bottom line seems to be this….doing what I did is a bit of a crap-shoot! There is a chance it could affect your standing on YouTube and more. BUT….the majority of the time, you’ll probably get an outcome similar to what I got here. For me it was win-win. They’re allowing me to use the audio and I gained first-hand knowledge of YouTube’s procedures for handling breach of copyright. When I changed the video classification to “public”, I added this statement in the liner notes…… ***The ADs you see here are not mine. The registered owner of "Look Away" chose to allow use of their audio content in exchange for placing ads in my video. Since I had no commercial aspirations for this project anyway, I thought that arrangement was more than fair! For anyone interested, here’s the video that brought about this learning experience - https://youtu.be/VRdqL_UCQz0 Tom Hoffman Songstuff member profilehttp://www.tune-smith.comhttp://www.youtube.com/user/DrumStuffTH
  2. Each of the above quotes was copy/pasted directly from a publically classified Youtube video. Each is slightly different, but the obvious intents are identical.....the posters wish to absolve themselves of any potential liability. The things is, unless I'm incredibly misinformed, these disclaimers are absolutely useless! Legally speaking, they accomplish nothing! Essentially. what they have done is...... violate copyright then attach a disclaimer stated that they had no intention of doing what they'd already done. I was very careful in my collection of these disclaimers. Each was taken from a "MONETIZED" video. For those unfamiliar with the term, "monetized" means that the poster of the video is attempting to profit from the posting of it by allowing revenue-sharing ADs to be run in conjunction with them. In other words, the person who posted the video is attempting to profit from a video that they specifically stated they don't own the rights to. Seemingly, it's OK with Google....which I find absolutely amazing. But I'll leave that discussion for another day. I first began noticing disclaimers like this a couple months ago, but as time passes, I'm seeing more and more. It's obviously caught on! Don't believe me? Just pull up Youtube and do a quick search under "no copyright infringement intended"....you'll see! While I have no intention of going on a rampage about this, I certainly thought it was worthy of public mention and perhaps further discussion.....hence my post. I trust that if I've misstated or misunderstood something here, that will be pointed out to me via a response. But in my mind, this practice is the equivalent of...... stealing from someone then leaving a note stating that "you didn't intend to steal from them" WTF? One would have to assume that these posters....... don't actually understand what a copyright is or simply don't care Tom
×