Jump to content

Your Ad Could Be Here

madbutnotmad

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Music Background

  • Musical / Songwriting / Music Biz Skills
    novice songwriter

Profile Information

  • Location
    England (UK)
  • Gender
    Male

madbutnotmad's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare
  • One Year In Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. when i first started using computer music software, it was before DAW were accessible to the "normal" people. Many of the software programs were MIDI Sequencer based. During these years, I first used a MOTU program called Freestyle which was a MIDI sequencer on a MAC Performa 630. Using hard ware synthesizers and hardware samplers with MIDI interfaces (and daisy chaining the various devices through my simple 1 in 1 out midi interface). As time went on, i expanded my home studio to include a more sophisticated MOTU 8 in 8 out MIDI interface, that allowed me much easier configurations for setting up MIDI devices. but also I transferred to steinberg cubase, still on the mac. along with several other apps. Still no hard disk recording. Later on, I went to uni to do a degree in sound engineering / sound tech at a famous UK performing art school. Where i was taught to use Digidesign (now Avid) protools, and emagic (now Apple) Logic. Now years after graduating I still use several of the apps. However, as much as i loved Logic Pro, I stopped using it, as I simply couldn't afford to keep up with having to buy new computer hardware every year or so. As a music composer / producer, I prefer Logic and Cubase, as the environments to write music, as they are much easier to use (with MIDI) than some of the others. As an engineer, I prefer to use Protools, due the precision that the program deals with digital audio. Protools, when known, is faster and easier to use than the others. However, as a writer / engineer / producer if i have to make a choice one over the other if cost was also a consideration then cubase is the one that wins at the mo as Apple simply has made using their exclusive programs too expensive cubase on a windows 10 base is better value for money however if money wasn't a consideration i would have a super mac with as much ram as possible with a fast as possible cpu with loads of UAD audio interfaces and UAD DSP hardware loaded with cubase, protools and logic to name but a few... maybe one day....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By continuing to use our site you indicate acceptance of our Terms Of Service: Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy, our Community Guidelines: Guidelines and our use of Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.