Jump to content

Your Ad Could Be Here

john

Editors
  • Posts

    16,715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    655

Everything posted by john

  1. Hi I wondered which acoustic guitarists made the biggest impact on your approach to music? It's a broad question I guess, and as ever it may be different people at different times or in different styles. I remember the first time I heard 'Technopicker', an album by Adrian Legg. It blew me away and really opened my ears to what could be achieved on an acoustic guitar. So, whatchafink? Cheers John
  2. Hey Kj As long as the producer can put their ego aside... Maybe the title 'producer' should be changes to 'Ego Manager'! To be honest, the phrase I find I use most when producing bands is 'Get over it...'. the transition from amateur band to a professional outfit can be a difficult one, and there are a lot of hard lessons to learn. And for those that don't learn there's always the future of wedding bands! Cheers John
  3. Hi Got any Bass links you'd like to rcommend for Songstuff? Just post them here... Cheers John
  4. Hey BS I've got an ESI 4000 if that's any help... And I still use it regularly... Cheers John
  5. Hi BS Not fond of the Orbits, moby's of this world? I have to say I do like the Royksopp album... Cheers John
  6. Hi I guess it depends on the music, and the reason you make it. A lot of music that is intended to get the user up to dance is pretty strict on the beat, where as tracks that are dynamic in emotions tend to interpret tempo and rhythm in a far free-er and lose way. As far as using electronic or midi based drums there are a number of ways to 'humanise' performances. 1. Record a real drummer using an electronic kit. The hits can then be edited in time and weight, and sound, very easily. 2. Set up a midi part in strict time. Now 'groove' quantise. This is a variation on quantise that pushes an pulls beats in time and weight to humanise the drums. In Cakewalk you can also approximate this using a CAL file. 3. Use a 'tempo map' or similar to adjust the playback tempo to emulate a more natural and emmotive interpretation of the music. This can be used to create the song section based tempo changes (Like Drumtracks breakdown of tempo variations) and prog rock elements. 4. Get Drumtracks to record your drum part for you! Cheers John
  7. Hi Depending on your mixer, software or hardware, they can provide 'group' tracks. You can assign individual channels to a group, and manipulate the group from there. For example, for a drum mix, you can assign the drums to groups 1 and 2, as a stereo pair. Set up the pan, eq, and relative volumes using the individual mixer channels (channel strips). As the channels are all assigned to group 1/2, the group fader can now be used to fade up/down the entire kit, or send through an aux to a global reverb etc. So the kit balance between the individual drums and cymbals is achieved with the individual channels, the overall level of the drums in the mix is controlled with the group faders. tadaa! Cheers John
  8. Steve Come on, don't be shy. You know as well as I do that there are more ways to put a track together than there are to please a woman. So for all the in-experienced mixers, share your 'pleasing' techniques! I'm sure you get enough of my opinions and advice without me adding more! Cheers John
  9. Hi having seen a few tracks criticised for the mix I thought a thread about setting up a mix would be useful. So what do you do? How do you prepare? Do you have standard way to approach a mix? Cheers John
  10. Hi One of my friends is looking for a new Bass amp. Until now he has used an Orange amp head with a Selmer 18" speaker cabinet. He uses a Rickenbacker bass, I'm not sure of the model. So what should he look at. The local music shops have some reasonable amps, but he's not kept up with bass gear and what's new, so, any suggestions? Cheers John
  11. Hi Rudi XLR is a connection type like a jack plug. You'll have used these kind of 3 pin connectors on mike leads all the time. Phantom power is normally a 48v power supply used to supplly microphones that don't have a battery. Some desks have phantom power, or you can get a stand alone phantom power unit. If you're serious about a VS as a second hand purchase get a VS1680 or above. This has all the improvements I mentioned above. Cheers John
  12. Hi BS Best use of an electronics text book I've heard of. Well done! John
  13. HI Rudi I have a V-Xpanded VS880. Basically this is the VS880 with the FX expansion. Pros: Firstly it's pretty versatile, and after you've digested a few concepts it's pretty easy to use. The quality and portability are what makes it though. The fact that you can sync it up with your sequencer really helps, especially as this means you can effectively have 12 tracks at mix down (8 recorded plus 4 from the inputs). The FX are also really good, and versatile, Cons: The VS880 doesn't use mike xlr or phantom power. The screen is very small and not backlit. Only 1 aux and only 4 inputs at a time. These issues are all addressed in the later models. The big bug bear for me was that in order to use the external scsi cdrom writer you had to buy the Roland approved CDROM drive which was a quarter the price of the unit (as an addon). So I just mixed down onto my PC and used it's cd writer. To me the overall package was very worth the money. If you have any specific questions just post back. Cheers John
  14. Hi KillerJoe I currently use Tannoy M1s. They're good but the bass response is a bit coloured. I'm planning on getting Tannoy Reveals soon. Cheers John
  15. Hi Rudi You mean like the VS-880? Cheers John
  16. john

    Buy Guitar FX...

    Hi Rudi Not yet. Cash flow restrictions! I'm still looking about, any recommendations? Cheers John
  17. Hi A decent mike will hear a pin drop. A Neumann will pick up the whooshing disturbance it makes as it falls through the air. So the rule of thumb is, if you want to get a decent vocal recording, get a decent mike. If you want whooshy air sounds too, get a Neumann:). Can you tell I can't afford one? Cheers John
  18. Hi Pops I think you have to go through a process of elimination to try and sort out which piece of equipment is colouring the sound. try monitoring the sound through headphones just after the preamp. For example take your preamp straight into a power amp and use the headphone output. To do this effectively you'll need to isolate yourself from the source. i.e. get someone other than you to play your trumpet. Double check all the signal paths on both your pre-amp and within your PC to make sue that settings are correct and that the signal you are recording doesn't contain a feedback loop. Are any other signals recorded through that channel tonally coloured in the same way? try another pre-amp with the same Mike and card. If both your Mikes are coloured the same way it's probably not the Mike. As I said you need to test each bit of kit in isolation. Is the pre-amp EQ switched in or out? Are the Mike boost/pad settings correct for the Mike type and signal levels? Do you have any other FX/compression etc in the signal path? Lastly: Are any other instruments recorded through this system using the same card I/O? Cheers John
  19. Hey Steve I don't want to hassle you but I am interested to know... Cheers John
  20. Hi I'm recording some new vocals where I need to get a vocal that uses a wide dynamic range. I like the vocal tone I get from close-ish miking, and I don't want to capture too much of the sound of the environment. I have a fair idea about how I would do it. What I wondered is how YOU would do it... Ideas in a post(card) please:) Cheers John
  21. Hi BS If it is any use I have a soundblaster Live! I'm not using...not top of the range by any means but it's there. Cheers John
  22. Hey Steve 'Perfect' recordings aside, it's really about what works. Although I have to admit, recording your acoustic guitar part without an acoustic is a bit radical! I look forward to hearing the results... Cheers John
  23. Hi Steve Well, I'm in Glasgow. Sure you still want to visit? Cheers John
  24. Hi Anyone created any real instrument patches from scratch? Pleased with the results? I thought I'd see if any of you were into actually creating the sounds instead of just using and tweaking presets. Sure they give the ability to work quickly, but to really learn the breadth and depth of a synth I think you have to at least try and create sounds from scratch. If not, sounds tend to take shape by accident rather than design. For me I think the sythesised sound I was most pleased with was a didgeridoo patch I created on my 01W. Its not the easiest of synth interfaces, and not the most flexible of synth designs but I was able to create passable imitations of several of the typical sounds created using a didger, all within one patch. I started by creating a reasonable pulsing drone, which I was able to inject tonal changes in, for rhythm, using aftertouch on the keys to give something close to the tonguing sound. I used the positive y-axis of the wheel to add something that resembled the variation in sounds you get as you change your mouth shape and the negative y-axis to add a change in the breathyness. Lastly I used the pich bend to vary the pitch to emulate the 'sung' notes So, what have you put together and how successful was it.... Cheers John
  25. Hi Can you give any examples of scripts and why you'd use them? Cheers John
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By continuing to use our site you indicate acceptance of our Terms Of Service: Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy, our Community Guidelines: Guidelines and our use of Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.