Funnily enough the article quoted was the one about doing cover songs and what you are obliged to do by law.
I should also say that by "warn him" I meant that other sites he is doing this with might be less forgiving than to ask for a simple copyright statement and the addition of a mention for the author. Fair enough I thought.
I actually tend to agree with you all, or did until this happened. Once before someone reproduced a full article, with a small link to Songstuff placed amongst others at the bottom of the page. He hadn't asked for permission, and hadn't published any copyright notice, which just encourages people to pull the article from his site if they come upon it first.
There are other articles that have fairly long paragraphs. On this occasion I'd say it was about 10 - 12% of the article, filling half a page on his site. I asked him to either add a copyright notice, reduce it to a simple link, or he was unwilling to do this, remove it. I also asked that if he wanted to quote such large sections of an article in the future that he similarly publish the copyright notice, and drop us a line to let us know. He removed it.
I'm not hugely bothered. I think what I had asked for in the circumstances was pretty fair. I was pretty nice about it too. I thought you guys would have some interesting opinions.
I guess the post by Nigel about lyric sites being closed down, and they will be or they will come to a licensing agreement, made me think about it. Reproduction in full IS copyright infringement. Many authors on Songstuff insist on full copyright notices on their work. I am also aware of several sites currently being pursued by other sites for this very infringement. The trouble is search engines now devalue the uniqueness of sites if their content is duplicated, meaning lower listings in results.
Does taking a comma out of article then allow that article to reproduced without consideration for the copyright owner? Interesting one.
I guess the problem is exaserbated by sites like Songstuff that are content sites. We don't have a large income from multiple product lines, our uniqueness is in our content. If someone can just lift it, then they can rip the whole site like a CD. It has happened...
It is a difficult one. Several times similarish things have happened, and I've done nothing. For one reason or another I thought this one was worth tackling.
The trouble with this whole area is what "is acceptable" is a bit like "how long is a bit of string?". Look what happened when artists didn't credit the artists they sampled in the 80s and 90s. It's kind of the same neck of the woods. Remember Black Box "Ride on Time"? They lifted the entire song including the vocal performance, and gave zero credit to the original artist.
I do want promotion for Songstuff, but at what cost.
An interesting topic I think. A difficult one especially as it's not my area!
Cheers
John