Jump to content

Your Ad Could Be Here

Do You Subscribe To This Songwriting Idea?


Recommended Posts

Do you subscribe to the idea that the verses of your song should be very specific and detail oriented, while the choruses are more general? I've always thought that was a great and organized way to write and I've heard it taught this way many times. 
 
On the other hand, I've heard Springsteen say he approaches things the opposite of this. 
 
What do you think?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I tend to write with the verse providing detail such as an evolving story, or painting images, but rather than making the chorus "more general" I use the chorus to comment on the verse or offer a different perspective while in both cases using the chorus to deliver the fundamental message of the song. I don't always follow this pattern but it is my dominant approach.

 

Either way, in AB or ABC form you are using distinct musical sections, generally establishing variations in dynamic and emotional intensity from section to section. As such there is a strong encouragement for the lyrics to follow suite, giving a different lyrical feel from section to section. Perspective, tone, vehicle and purpose are obvious variations to include, on a sectional basis, whether you assign detail to verse and message to chorus or the other way around.

 

There are obvious reasons why a chorus tends to have the message.

 

  • Choruses tend to have the catchiest musical hooks.
  • A message is communicated at it's best when it is repeated.
  • Multiple voices serve to underline and strengthen the lyrics, which makes them ideally suited to deliver messages.
  • Multiple voices singing a repeated line matches the definition of a chorus (chorus being the name for multiple voices, it's the root of the section of music we now call a chorus)

 

That said a chorus can still add detail, or evolve meaning as choruses can and do sometimes contain lines that change from repetition to repetition, but the chorus is the section that contains the primary lyrical hook, hook melody etc.

 

True the picture becomes a bit more complicated if you deviate away from a standard AB (verse-chorus) form, for example to include a refrain line within the verse, the chorus still fulfils it's fundamental purpose.

 

Maybe Bruce has just decided to swap what he calls verse and what he calls chorus? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I tend to write with the verse providing detail such as an evolving story, or painting images, but rather than making the chorus "more general" I use the chorus to comment on the verse or offer a different perspective while in both cases using the chorus to deliver the fundamental message of the song. I don't always follow this pattern but it is my dominant approach.

 

Hey John -- yeah, I think that's a really good way of looking at it. You also then have to consider a further perspective... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Noob

After getting hit with the inspiration (how it usually happens for me), the situation dictates based on what inspired me and the "mood" I'm in.  As crazy as that sounds, it's true and I don't know how many others can relate to this, but here we go.

 

I watched a movie the other night about family.  I started thinking about MY family and (particularly) my two year old son.  Given the theme of the movie and where the inspiration was taking me, I came up with an initial draft that's probably going to end up as a ballad, but has potential for a moderate country pace.  I was thinking about the ABAB, ABC structure and wanted something different.  There are times (for me) when "traditional" just doesn't feel right so I wrote "The Spitting Image of Me" with 5 verses and no chorus.  The last half of the last line of each verse is, ".......the spitting image of me".  It think it's a good initial draft, but the structure doesn't parallel any other traditional setups that I've seen.  Not the first time I've written a song with that same structure (it was a ballad too).  My very first song that was structured like this was a good one "Message For You", BUT got some good criticism because it not only had no chorus, BUT also didn't state what the "Message For You" was.  Hey, it was my first attempt at anything like that and was a few years ago.  Anyway, just food for thought.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Due to my relative inexperience I'll just say first that I haven't written enough, let alone had a fanbase for one of my songs commercially or otherwise, to say that one style works best for me over another in this regard.  I will, however, like to throw in with Will23 on the great songs that had either verses but nor chorus, or, in the case of Queen and others, a multitude of choruses and verses.  Rock opera tends to those more than others, but I digress.  I try to write what feels best for the song instead of forcing it one way or another, though it still doesn't flow as freely as writing prose fiction does for me yet.  I'm working on it though, which is part of why I joined here tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any Springsteen songs as examples of this turnaround? There's no reason why it shouldn't work, especially with poetic skills like those of The Boss. It seems as a rule though, if you take most songs the approach Anthony suggests will be the norm.

 

Another way of looking at comparative lyrics for verse and chorus is that the verse deals with information, or the story, where the chorus provides an emotional comment on what has been introduced in the verse. These lyrical imperatives are supported by the musical hooks and melodies stuff John talks about above.

 

As a side issue, it seems the bridge often provides a resolution to a story or an answer to a problem, a new direction or a new angle.

 

But hey, if we can discover these "rules" without even knowing about them, they are either so hard-wired that they are too obvious to mention, or so essential that songs just don't work without them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To put it in non-musical terms:

 

     My verses provide the examples to support the conclusion presented in the chrorus.

 

For those rare times I don't have distinctive verses and choruses (chorai?)

 

    the first n lines support the conclusion presented in the hook (usually last) line of each verse.

 

My bridge will usually describe the reaching of a crisis point, decision time, a call to action, or just a totally different perspective.

 

But I won't argue with what the Boss says, he has sold way more records than I have!

 

Kel

Edited by Kel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Your Ad Could Be Here

Guests are always welcome...

but...

JOINING as a MEMBER (FREE) provides you with many benefits:

  • it is FREE
  • you will NOT be sent emails UNLESS you sign up for them
  • + you can interact with posts
  • you can create new Topics
  • you can directly message other members
  • you can seek critiques of your own work
  • you can offer critiques on the work of others
  • after a few posts you can post your own music and videos
  • have your songs/videos considered for Songstuff's official Playlists


  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $1,040
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By continuing to use our site you indicate acceptance of our Terms Of Service: Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy, our Community Guidelines: Guidelines and our use of Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.